首页> 外文OA文献 >Babies, bodies and entitlement: gendered aspects of access to citizenship in the Republic of Ireland
【2h】

Babies, bodies and entitlement: gendered aspects of access to citizenship in the Republic of Ireland

机译:婴儿,尸体和应享权利:爱尔兰共和国获得公民身份的性别方面

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Since the mid-1990s, automatic citizenship for children born in the Republic has been a source of growing debate against a backdrop of increasing immigration and the peace process. In June 2004, the debate culminated in a referendum, opening the way to a constitutional amendment that attaches residence qualifications to the hitherto unfettered entitlement to citizenship available through ius soli. Arguments for the amendment were couched in terms of a threat posed by Third World women having babies in Ireland to obtain residence, and a putative obligation to the EU to harmonise citizenship laws. This article explores how pregnant foreign women’s bodies became a site of perplexity about the borders of the twenty-first century Irish nation. It is therefore suggested that neither the ‘racial state’ theories nor feminist theories of the nation-state account fully for this. On closer inspection, the seemingly sui generis case of the Irish referendum is therefore fruitful in that it demands further reflection in terms of bridging gaps in the existing theory.
机译:自1990年代中期以来,在移民和和平进程日益增加的背景下,共和国出生的儿童的自动公民身份一直引起越来越多的辩论。 2004年6月,辩论在全民投票中达到高潮,为宪法修正案开辟了道路,该修正案将居留资格附加到ius soli可获得的迄今为止不受限制的公民资格中。提出该修正案的论点是,第三世界妇女在爱尔兰育有婴儿要获得居留权所构成的威胁,以及欧盟对统一国籍法的推定义务。本文探讨了外国孕妇的身体如何成为困扰二十一世纪爱尔兰国家边界的困惑之地。因此,建议民族国家的“种族国家”理论或女权主义理论都不能完全解释这一点。经过仔细检查,爱尔兰公投看似特殊的案例因此硕果累累,因为它需要在弥补现有理论空白方面进行进一步反思。

著录项

  • 作者

    Garner, Steve J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号